[1] Peter M Fayers. Applying item response theory and computer adaptive testing: the challenges for health outcomes assessment. Qual Life Res, 16 Suppl 1:187-94, 2007. [ bib ]
[2] Bryce B Reeve, Laurie B Burke, Yen-pin Chiang, Steven B Clauser, Lisa J Colpe, Jeffrey W Elias, John Fleishman, Ann A Hohmann, Wendy L Johnson-Taylor, William Lawrence, Claudia S Moy, Louis A Quatrano, William T Riley, Barbara A Smothers, and Ellen M Werner. Enhancing measurement in health outcomes research supported by agencies within the us department of health and human services. Qual Life Res, 16 Suppl 1:175-86, 2007. [ bib ]
[3] Dennis A Revicki and Jeff Sloan. Practical and philosophical issues surrounding a national item bank: if we build it will they come? Qual Life Res, 16 Suppl 1:167-74, 2007. [ bib ]
[4] Chih-Hung Chang. Patient-reported outcomes measurement and management with innovative methodologies and technologies. Qual Life Res, 16 Suppl 1:157-66, 2007. [ bib ]
[5] Otto B Walter, Janine Becker, Jakob B Bjorner, Herbert Fliege, Burghard F Klapp, and Matthias Rose. Development and evaluation of a computer adaptive test for 'anxiety' (anxiety-cat). Qual Life Res, 16 Suppl 1:143-55, 2007. [ bib ]
[6] David Cella, Richard Gershon, Jin-Shei Lai, and Seung Choi. The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Qual Life Res, 16 Suppl 1:133-41, 2007. [ bib ]
[7] Karon F Cook, Cayla R Teal, Jakob B Bjorner, David Cella, Chih-Hung Chang, Paul K Crane, Laura E Gibbons, Ron D Hays, Colleen A McHorney, Katja Ocepek-Welikson, Anastasia E Raczek, Jeanne A Teresi, and Bryce B Reeve. Irt health outcomes data analysis project: an overview and summary. Qual Life Res, 16 Suppl 1:121-32, 2007. [ bib ]
[8] David Thissen, Bryce B Reeve, Jakob Bue Bjorner, and Chih-Hung Chang. Methodological issues for building item banks and computerized adaptive scales. Qual Life Res, 16 Suppl 1:109-19, 2007. [ bib ]
[9] Jakob Bue Bjorner, Chih-Hung Chang, David Thissen, and Bryce B Reeve. Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Qual Life Res, 16 Suppl 1:95-108, 2007. [ bib ]
[10] Neil J Dorans. Linking scores from multiple health outcome instruments. Qual Life Res, 16 Suppl 1:85-94, 2007. [ bib ]
[11] Paul K Crane, Laura E Gibbons, Katja Ocepek-Welikson, Karon Cook, David Cella, Kaavya Narasimhalu, Ron D Hays, and Jeanne A Teresi. A comparison of three sets of criteria for determining the presence of differential item functioning using ordinal logistic regression. Qual Life Res, 16 Suppl 1:69-84, 2007. [ bib ]
[12] Jeanne A Teresi, Katja Ocepek-Welikson, Marjorie Kleinman, Karon F Cook, Paul K Crane, Laura E Gibbons, Leo S Morales, Maria Orlando-Edelen, and David Cella. Evaluating measurement equivalence using the item response theory log-likelihood ratio (irtlr) method to assess differential item functioning (dif): applications (with illustrations) to measures of physical functioning ability and general distress. Qual Life Res, 16 Suppl 1:43-68, 2007. [ bib ]
[13] Jeanne A Teresi and John A Fleishman. Differential item functioning and health assessment. Qual Life Res, 16 Suppl 1:33-42, 2007. [ bib ]
[14] Steven P Reise, Julien Morizot, and Ron D Hays. The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Qual Life Res, 16 Suppl 1:19-31, 2007. [ bib ]
[15] Maria Orlando Edelen and Bryce B Reeve. Applying item response theory (irt) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Qual Life Res, 16 Suppl 1:5-18, 2007. [ bib ]
[16] Ron D Hays and Joseph Lipscomb. Next steps for use of item response theory in the assessment of health outcomes. Qual Life Res, 16 Suppl 1:195-9, 2007. [ bib ]

This file was generated by bibtex2html 1.96.