[1] Jum C Nunnally and Ira H Bernstein. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill Series in Psychology, Third edition, 1994. [ bib ]
[2] J L Fleiss. Balanced incomplete block designs for inter-rater reliability studies. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5:105-112, 1981. [ bib ]
[3] Bruce Thompson, editor. Score Reliability. Contemporary Thinking on Reliability issues. Sage Publications, 2003. [ bib ]
[4] L Wilkinson & APA Task Force on Statistical Inference. Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54:594-604, 1999. reprint available through the APA Home Page: http://www.apa.org/journals/amp/amp548594.html. [ bib ]
[5] Graham Dunn. Statistics in Psychiatry. Hodder Arnold, 2000. [ bib ]
[6] R A Charter and L S Feldt. Testing the equality of two alpha coefficients. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82:763-768, 1996. [ bib ]
[7] Ron D Hays and Dennis Revicki. Reliability and validity (including responsiveness). In Peter Fayers and Ron Hays, editors, Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Trials, chapter 1.3, pages 25-39. Oxford University Press, Second edition, 2005. [ bib ]
[8] P E Shrout and J L Fleiss. Intraclass correlation: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86:420-428, 1979. [ bib ]
[9] Alan Agresti. Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley-Interscience, 1990. [ bib ]
[10] J L Fleiss. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York: Wiley, Second edition, 1981. [ bib ]
[11] Sidney Siegel and Jr N John Castellan. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill, Second edition, 1988. [ bib ]
[12] J Cohen. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20:37-46, 1960. [ bib ]
[13] J Cohen. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement with provision for scales disagreement of partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70:213-220, 1968. [ bib ]
[14] Claude Bonnet. Manuel pratique de psychophysique. Armand Colin, 1986. [ bib ]
[15] J Neyman and E S Pearson. On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A, CCXXXI:289-337, 1933. [ bib ]
[16] Ian Hacking. Logic of Statistical Inference. Cambridge University Press, 1965. [ bib ]
[17] J Neyman. First Course in Probability and Statistics. New York: Holt, 1950. [ bib ]
[18] Bruno Falissard. Mesurer la subjectivité en santé. Perspective mééthodologique et statistique. Masson, 2008. [ bib ]
[19] P M Fayers and D Machin. Quality of life. The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Wiley, 2000. [ bib ]
[20] B Bush, S Shaw, P Cleary, T L Delbanco, and M D Aronson. Screening for alcohol abuse using the cage questionnaire. American Journal of Medicine, 82:231-235, 1987. [ bib ]
[21] C Poulin, I Webster, and E Single. Alcohol disorders in canada as indicated by the cage questionnaire. Canadian Medicine Association Journal, 157:1529-1535, 1997. [ bib ]
[22] J J Deeks and D G Altman. Sensitivity and specificity and their confidence intervals cannot exceed 100%. British Medical Journal, 318:193, 1999. [ bib ]
[23] Kenneth J Rothman and Sander Greenland. Modern Epidemiology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Second edition, 1998. [ bib ]
[24] S Greenland, A Salvan, D H Wegman, M F Hallock, and T J Smith. A case-control study of cancer mortality at a transformer-assembly facility. International Archives of Occupational and Environemental Health, 66:49-54, 1994. [ bib ]
[25] R Harper and B Reeves. Reporting of precision of estimates for diagnostic accuracy: A review. British Medical Journal, 318:1322-1323, 1999. [ bib ]
[26] J E Danes and O K Mann. Unidimensional measurement and strucutral equation models with latent variables. Journal of Business Research, 12:337-352, 1984. [ bib ]
[27] D De Vaus. Analyzing social science data. London: Sage Publications, 2002. [ bib ]
[28] C R Rao and S Sinharay, editors. Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 26: Psychometrics. Elsevier Science B.V.: The Netherlands, 2007. [ bib ]
[29] T Raykov. “alpha if item deleted”: A note on loss of criterion validity in scale development if maximizing coefficient alpha. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61:275-285, 2008. [ bib ]
[30] T Raykov. Reliability if deleted, not “alpha if deleted”: evaluation of scale reliability following component deletion. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 60:201-216, 2007. [ bib ]
[31] T Raykov. Scale reliability, cronbach's coefficient alpha, and violations of essential tau-equivalence for fixed congeneric components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32:329-354, 1997. [ bib ]
[32] W Sun, C-P Chou, A W Stacy, H Ma, J Unger, and P Gallaher. SAS and SPSS macros to calculate standardized cronbach’s alpha using the upper bound of the phi coefficient for dichotomous items. Behavior Research Methods, 39(1):71-81, 2007. [ bib ]
[33] K Sijtsma. Reliability beyond theory and into practice. Psychometrika, 74(1):169-173, 2009. [ bib ]
[34] W Revelle and R E Zinbarg. Coefficients alpha, beta, omega and the glb: comments on sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1):145-154, 2009. [ bib ]
[35] R E Zinbarg, W Revelle, I Yovel, and W Li. Cronbach's α, Revelle's β, and McDonald's ωh: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1):123-133, 2005. [ bib ]
[36] G F Kuder and M W Richardson. The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2:151-160, 1937. [ bib ]
[37] L J Cronbach. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16:297-334, 1951. [ bib ]
[38] L J Cronbach and R J Shavelson. My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(3):391-418, 2004. [ bib ]
[39] L Guttman. A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10(4):255-282, 1945. [ bib ]
[40] W Revelle. Hierarchical cluster-analysis and the internal structure of tests. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14(1):57-74, 1979. [ bib ]
[41] B D Zumbo, A M Gadermann, and C Zeisser. Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6:21-29, 2007. [ bib ]
[42] B D Zumbo. Validity: Foundational issues and statistical methodology. In C R Rao and S Sinharay, editors, Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 26: Psychometrics, pages 45-79. Elsevier Science B.V.: The Netherlands, 2007. [ bib ]
[43] M G Kendall and B Babington Smith. The problem of m rankings. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 10:275-287, 1939. [ bib ]
[44] P Legendre. Coefficient of concordance. In N J Salkind, editor, Encyclopedia of Research Design. SAGE Publications, 2010. [ bib ]
[45] E McColl. Developing questionnaires. In P Fayers and R Hays, editors, Assessing quality of life in clinical trials, pages 9-21. Oxford University Press, second edition, 2005. [ bib ]
[46] C H Lawshe. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4):563-575, 1975. [ bib ]
[47] J Fowles. Handbook of futures research. Greenwood Press: Connecticut, 1978. [ bib ]
[48] M De Cáceres and P Legendre. Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecology, 90:3566-3574, 2009. [ bib ]
[49] R P Althauser and T A Heberlein. Validity and the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Sociological Methodology, 2:151-169, 1970. [ bib ]
[50] V Benet-Martínez and O P John. ph Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethod analyses of the big five in spanish and english. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3):729-750, 1998. [ bib ]
[51] B O Muthén. Latent variable modelling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika, 54:557-585, 1989. [ bib ]
[52] B O Muthén. Means and covariance structure analysis of hierarchical data. Technical Report 62, Los Angeles: UCLA, 1990. [ bib ]
[53] B O Muthén. Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 22:376-398, 1994. [ bib ]
[54] K F Gold and B O Muthén. Extensions of covariance structure analysis: Hierarchical modeling of multidimensional achievement data. In Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois, April 1991. [ bib ]
[55] C A McHorney, J E Ware, J F R Lu, and C D Sherbourne. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): (3) tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care, 32:40-66, 1994. [ bib ]
[56] R P Althauser, T A Heberlein, and R A Scott. A causal assessment of validity: The augmented multitrait-multimethod matrix. In H M Blalock, editor, Causal Models in the Social Sciences, pages 151-169. Chicago: Aldine, 1971. [ bib ]
[57] F M Andrews. Construct validity and error components of survey measures: a structural modeling approach. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48:409-442, 1984. [ bib ]
[58] H W Marsh. Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait-multimethod data: Many problems and few solutions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13:335-361, 1989. [ bib ]
[59] M W Browne. The decomposition of multitrait-multimethod matrices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37:1-21, 1984. [ bib ]
[60] W E Saris and F M Andrews. Evaluation of measurement instruments using a structural modeling approach. In P P Biemer, R M Groves, L E Lyberg, N A Mathiowetz, and S Sudman, editors, Measurement Errors in Surveys, pages 575-597. New York: Wiley, 1991. [ bib ]
[61] S Kuenstner, C Langelotz, V Budach, K Possinger, B Krause, and O Sezer. The comparability of quality of life scores: a multitrait multimethod analysis of the eortc qlq-c30, sf-36 and flic questionnaires. European Journal of Cancer, 38(3):339-348, 2002. [ bib ]
[62] D T Campbell and D W Fiske. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, (81-105), 1959. [ bib ]

This file was generated by bibtex2html 1.95.