I came across a Racket package which aims to provide basic linear regression fitting utilities to Schemers. Unfortunately, it relies on the use of normal equations to solve the linear systems, which is rarely a good idea (think about what happens if the design matrix has a very irregular shape, or even condition number). Moreover, it is not very flexible regarding data i/o, but that’s not the point of this post.

Direct methods (i.e., matrix decomposition) have been discussed beforehand, e.g. here (Lisp) and here (Racket). Here is another direct method which relies on the SVD. Considering the linear system $X\beta = y$, the idea is to decompose $X$ as $\underset{m\times m}{U}\overset{m\times n}{\Sigma}\underset{n\times n}{V^T}$, where $U$ and $V$ are unitary matrices, and $\Sigma$ is a diagonal matrix filled with 0 for rows $n+1,\dots,m$.^{1} Then, $\hat\beta$ is obtained as $V^T\Sigma^{-1}U^Ty$. See The QR Algorithm Computes Eigenvalues and Singular Values to learn more about the relationship between the QR and SVD matrix decompositions.

To sum up, although solving normal equations is usually the fastest method, its squared condition number renders it less stable; QR decomposition is more stable at the expense of a larger cost, and SVD works well even in case $X$ is rank-deficient.

Here is a direct application in Racket, using the same example we used in a previous post. I’ll be using the excellent flomat package by Axel Søgaard.^{2}

```
#lang racket
(require flomat csv-reading)
(define (import file)
(csv->list ((make-csv-reader-maker
'((separator-chars #\,)
(quote-char . #f))) (open-input-file file))))
(define data (map (lambda (xs) (map string->number xs)) (cdr (import "/home/chl/tmp/birthwt.csv"))))
(define xs (matrix (map (lambda (xs) (list-ref xs 1)) data)))
(define ys (matrix (map (lambda (xs) (list-ref xs 9)) data)))
(define X (augment xs (flomat-ones (nrows xs) 1)))
(define-values (U S V) (svd X))
(times V (inv (diag S)) (transpose (sub U 0 0 (nrows U) 2)) ys)
;; => (flomat: ((12.429712027714643) (2655.74446970517)))
```

[2023-05-02]

To learn about more “traditional” Racket arrays, check the documentation or the following blog post, by Alex Harsányi: A Racket Array Tutorial.

To learn about more “traditional” Racket arrays, check the documentation or the following blog post, by Alex Harsányi: A Racket Array Tutorial.

Note that the above procedure returns a full matrix (m x m) for U, but we don’t really need the extra columns, hence the subsetting to the first two columns of $U$. For the record, we got the following results using Newlisp:

```
(gsl:QR-solve xs y)
;; => (2655,744469705172 12,4297120277146)
```

The Python version follows:

```
import numpy as np
import pandas
data = pandas.read_csv("/home/chl/tmp/birthwt.csv")
x = np.c_[np.ones(data.shape[0]), data["age"]]
y = data["bwt"]
U,S,V = np.linalg.svd(x, full_matrices=False)
V.T @ np.linalg.inv(np.diag(S)) @ U.T @ y
# => array([2655.74446971, 12.42971203])
```

♪ Emma Ruth Rundle • *Blooms of Oblivion*